3º E.S.O.
Writings
Writings
CORRECTIONS - NO MORE ACEPTED
Did you agree with the statement "Modern and contemporary art is not real art"?
Autor: German Herreiz Blasco
Yes, I agree. I am not an expert in art but, in my opinion, this thing so-called ``art´´ in my opinion isn´t art because it is more strange and sometimes horrifying, for example, the other day, I read the other day about an artist who painted her pictures with her own vomit. If I see saw her picture I would never buy, because it isn´t art, it is vomit, however people like and I don´t know like why.
On the one hand it´s really that art which only experts understand the experts so behind the first appearance but I don´t understand how people like pay millions for this pictures. these paintings
Fecha: 28/02/2013 15:43.
Autor: Marcos González Moreno
Modern and contemporary art are is often considerated not to be real art because of their oddity.
Personally, I don’t really like the art. I don’ think that a black spot on a white canvas can’t be considered a very valuable piece of art, but because the definition of art is "Whatever wich which just has just an aesthetic function" so, even the picture of the spot can be considered to be art following the definition.
Taking this into account, every piece of modern an contemporany art is, in fact, art, despite the people’s liking. likes and dislikes.
Fecha: 28/02/2013 18:38.
Autor: Beatriz Bosch Vila
No, I disagree with this statement. I think modern art is just a different art. Previously everything was more perfectionist, and contemporary art comes to innovation. It is true that sometimes turns out to be a bit "strange", but it is art after all. The dictionary defines "art" as a virtue, disposition and ability to do something. So, if a person is able to build a building, but not following the classical traditions, why should we say that it is not art? Inside each person there is a style, and that is what is transmitted with modern art, the individual art, but usually following a few prototypes, obviously. For me personally, I don’t like classical art neither the modern, I ’m more of prefer abstract art, or the well-known "impressionist one".
Fecha: 28/02/2013 19:22.
Autor: Raquel Mellado Culebras
No, I am not don’t agree with the statement. I don’t know enough about art in order to give my opinion about it like for judge it, but I like paintings. In my opinion, I think the modern and contemporary art is only a kind of art. Because for example, in my case, I think that the real art is the realistic works painting pictures, the old art...the art of hundreds of years ago
I don’t understand why there are people who pays millions of pounds for things that are supposed ’’art’’. People values more than it should the modern art is more worth-while.
Fecha: 28/02/2013 20:18.
Autor: Mar Asensi Bañón.
I disagree with that stament. Art has so many ways to be expressed, it just depends on how artists want the audience to perceive it.
At first art just represented the reality as the artist saw it, was a realistic type of art, but as humanity has developed, with this it has also developed new types of art, more appropiate of modern life or just an artist wanted to turn the toast and claim a new way of expression.
One relevant example of it could will be Andy Warhol, he made ’pop art’ of most day-to-day things and it is considered art, because not everybody have has the an genius’ mind of appling to everyday things artistic point of view and transform it into a work of art.
Fecha: 28/02/2013 20:24.
Autor: Andrea Martínez
In my opinion, considering myself an art-lover, this term is losing not its meaning but its essence. No one will ever complain about calling art the magnificent Baroque work of Caravaggio, as well nobody can deny the beauty of ’The Gates of Paradise’ by Ghiberti.
On the other hand there’re plenty debates about the legitimacy of calling art to modern art. It’s, fFor example, could a red dot on a white canvas art be considered as a work of art? For me the answer is no. I won’t put at the same level Durero’s ’Melencolia I’ and the what Andy Warhol made.
But we’re losing the true meaning of art, anything that makes us feel something big just by sensing it. Something beautiful.
So, although I don’t consider the majority most of contemporary art as art, I know that I would enjoy standing before ’The Gates of Hell’ by Rodin, even if Rodin is a modern artist.
The points of view are endless,that’s the true essence of art, anything can be beautiful depending on the eyes that look of the viewer
Fecha: 28/02/2013 20:47.
Autor: Mireia Cano Villafaina
From my point of view, Contemporany and Modern art it’ is less beautiful than classic art.
During the past centuries, it have done there are many works of art, such as "La Giocconda", the fresh frescoes of Sistine Chapel or "David" of by Michelangelo Miguel Ángel. We could say that there are real works of art because they have being visited by milions of tourists during the every year.
It’s true that in the last century also artists have also created were performed works masterworks such as "El Guernica", which it’ is also avowed well-known all over the world, but in this century also emerged Avant-garde Vanguards also emerged, which , in my opinion, I think that are abstract art and I don’t like them.
In summary, classic art have has been surviving living many centuries because it’s the real art.
Fecha: 01/03/2013 19:05.
Autor: Sofia Palacio Monterde
In my opinion, modern art is art even if some people disagree with my opinion because it’s true that it’s a different way of art and some people may not like it but i I think that every piece of art or every modern monument which/that makes you feel something, though even if it is surrealistic, but it is art, like the same as classic art.
Moreover every piece of classic art was modern when it had been made for example Barroque pieces were a new modern trend, because for a long time, art was just Renaissance productions but the Barroque trend broke the canon of that moment, which was Renaissance one and now we consider Brarroque pieces as classic art.
Fecha: 03/03/2013 17:28.
Autor: Ana Belén López Antón
I am going to talk about the affirmation statement “modern and contemporary art is not real art”. I am not don’t agree about it that statement, in my opinion art is not only one, two or three things. Art is all around us, and definitely we can not cannot say that modern or contemporary art is not a real art.
I think that we can not cannot define art as a concrete model, such as modern art or gothic art or classic art. One picture or one building for me can be modern and for other person can be classic. The art is something so much objective. subjective
For other part On the other hand, so much some kind of art is not considerate as art. If you go to the city centre of any city such as Venice or Paris you will see people playing violin, playing whatever instrument or even painting beautiful paintings on the floor. And sometimes it is not called art.
We have to consider make that type of art is also called real art.
Fecha: 08/03/2013 20:57.
Autor: Jonathan Martínez Lillo
In my opinion, the modern and contemporary art is not art, because it’s too weird and stupid. For me the real art is the classic one that is the art that has survived over the centuries. I personally do not like the art, I do not understand how a single point or a line can be considered as art, but the definition of art in the dictionary says that `` art is any activity or product done by man with a purpose aesthetic or communicative, through which they express ideas or emotions’’
I am not an art expert, so I can not cannot judge say whether a work is art or not, but my simple own opinion is that true art is the classic one.
Fecha: 22/03/2013 18:46.
Fecha: 14/04/2013 20:28.
Autor: Alba Moreno Giménez
A lot of people don´t like a modern and contemporany art because they considerate it things without sense.
This people is are acostumbrated used to clasic art ....paintings ...classic sculture...
They live in the past. The times are changing and the art too.
I think that modern art is an interesting way to see the world, but personally I don´t like a modern art because in my opinion the art-work looks like as if they would have weren´t been worked like the classic arts-work.
Fecha: 23/04/2013 17:37.
Autor: Damián Quiles Navarro
I disagree with that statement contemporary art is not real art. Art is a something different and it is difficult to see and understand the great artists but if you can understand it, and therefore you could interpret their great art. Different colors are used and rare forms strange shapes, but not it has not have to be real, because objects are not abstract or real landscapes, not to discriminate (?) this art.
The stages of art there are evolving and you might not like, but it is enough to know of about their art to be appreciated.
Fecha: 24/04/2013 12:16.
Autor: Daniel Tomas Valero
On the one hand, the modern and contemporary art is a new form of way to make art, because the things are in continuous development. On the other hand, this type of art is most more different that than the usual art common.
Further more , nowadays there are more people that who dislike the contemporany art contemporany but too there are also more artists than who prefer make modern art contemporany that the common art. This art is a type of art that which cannot be understand understood for by all people. everyone
All in all, it is likely it’s that the reason for that why art contemporany isn’t art for all people everybody , because they don’t understand this art.
Perhaps it’s better not to think about the answer to that question [Why? You should do it in PAU exam.]
Fecha: 07/05/2013 18:21.
Autor: Efraín Jiménez Molina
I disagree with that statement. I think that art is every something which is very visual or auditive thing and that makes you take your mind off things, go away from the place you are, and not only a beautiful image copied from a woman or a still life. Lots of great painters couldn’t be able to see their job work recognised, for instance, Vincent Van Gogh or Franz Kafka. Frida Khalo [Franz Kafka is a writer, not a painter]
I don’t know enough about art to give a adequate suitable opinion, but I think that this art is another kind of art. Artists express themselves through art, and perhaps their surreal vision of the world can’t be understood by our little minds yet anyone [your comment is too personal, too modest]
Fecha: 12/05/2013 08:00.
CORRECTIONS - NO MORE ACEPTED
Do you think that life is possible without technology these days? Give reasons.
Autor: Germán Herreiz Blasco
As far as I am concerned people may not life cannot live without technology because we have reached a point that we use it for everything, I think most of people don´t survive without this invent in contrast most of people survive others do because they don´t use it, only for the necessary things. In the same way in this time is necessary the technology is necessary for example in the battle fight with all diseases with the finally to find a cure finally, in addition the videogames are better than ten year ago, similarly computers with in cars and other things.
In conclusion, I think that humanity isn´t prepared to live without technology could be.
Fecha: 28/02/2013 16:04.
Autor: Alba Moreno Giménez
Some time ago, people dídn’t use the technology that exist which there is nowadays. People used to play to populars games such as skipping rope ("comba", in Spanish), spinning top (" peonza" in Spanish), noughts and crosses ("las tres en ralla" in Spanish) and they used to play with toys instead of videogames.
Now, children play videogames, psp PSP and DS consoles , ds ... and so on. There is a lot of new technology. The Things have changed a lot very much in the last years.
In my opinion, we can live without technology like our parents did. I think that my generation depends of on technology and we aren’t prepared to live without it.
Fecha: 28/02/2013 18:22.
Autor: Andrea Martínez
A life without technology? In my point of view I think society has reached a point where it’s impossible to get rid from technology for a long term. Leaving Internet aside is hard to imagine, because we are used to live living with all kind of facilities like TVs, computers, phones, video game consoles and so on. And besides that Moreover, there are many types of technology which are applied to our well-being that and are currently being used to build things appliances like such as fridges, hobs or cars, and we simply cannot live without them anymore. longer.
Our working system would radically change without, for example, mass production; and we couldn’t travel comfortably without the infrastructures that we provide.
Ultimately, society is not prepared to live without the technology that led us to where we are and helped us to escape from the caves. [Too much, isn’t it?]
Fecha: 28/02/2013 18:52.
Autor: Efraín Jiménez Molina
In these times, in my opinión, it would be very difficult living without tecnology. There’s a TV ** series called “Revolution”, which shows us a world without electricity. The people there have been living for fifteen years without it, and it is caused by a strange and unknown phenomenon, that which happened in the whole world at the same time. We can see there could examine a medieval civilization from Middle Ages, where people lived in communities, and a military group has had taken the power of the country. People lived in poor living conditions, caused by the heavy taxes. I think that this series shows a possible situation, and it makes us think about how tough would be a life without tecnology or electricity .
**[series, sing=plural]
Fecha: 28/02/2013 19:06.
Autor: Daniel Jarque Pérez
In the actually Nowadays, the people can’t live without technology, because, they use the technology in the most of the things that they do daily, such as drive driving a electric cars, using use de new mobile phones ( Iphone, HTC, Samsung and other brands) see watching the new television sets, see and 3D movies, playing XBOX 360, Playstation 3 consoles, etc. In the medicine, thanks to technology, it has been possible been able to cure for many diseases, such as cancer, hemophilia, diabetes, etc.. and others
But despite all this, once, when the technology was not so advanced didn’t exist, the people could live without using the technology, for example, they played with spinning tops (“peonzas” in Spanish), board games, etc… and so on.
In my opinion, as I didn’t live in a time without technology, currently for people, the use of technology is essential in life.
Fecha: 28/02/2013 19:45.
Autor: Raquel Mellado Culebras
Many years ago, nobody used to use new technologies such as phones, video games,computers, Play Stations consoles and so on .... because there wasn’t weren’t technologies. When we were a children, if we wanted to play with our friends, we used to have to go to the park at in the afternoons after school.
However, nowadays, if we have a mobile phone we can do a lot of things like such as talking with to somebody in a long distance, sending messages, take taking photos, even to use using the Internet.
For these reasons, I think that we can live without technology nowadays but its it’s complicated don’t use stop using these technology, because we are accustomed have got used to use it sit at the computer table every days day and sometimes the news new [adjectives always without S, sing=plual] technologies can be necessary.
Fecha: 28/02/2013 19:47.
Autor: Ana Carbonell Aréjula
In my opinion, a life without technology would be very difficult, because society has learned got used to live with all kinds of technologies, such as television, cars, computers, the Internet and so on ... If that is true, that Years ago the society and especially children used to amuse entertained themselves playing with a ball or a rope and they lived happily but today we could not live without teconologia technology because during all this time has been shown to be used to practically everything. nowadays technology is all around.
Besides, I like to travel travelling and if there were no cars or planes or trains I could not travel comfortably!
In conclusion, the country world would not be prepared to live if teconologia without technology , I think it would be a disaster
Fecha: 28/02/2013 19:48.
Autor: Beatriz Bosch Vila
It’s difficult to imagine a society without the technology we have now. A few years ago, people were able to communicate without mobile phones, using telephone boxes located in the streets.** Much less existed There were not applications such as WhatsApp or Messenger, which was are beneficial very useful, but at present because when you left go out to have and have a beer with friends, you conversed with should talk to them face to face, but the problem is that weren’t everybody with don’t stop using their mobiles, abstracted from paying no attention to the world around reality.** Many people think that the mobile phone is advantageous because you can communicate from anywhere, especially in emergencies. But I think if people got used to be able to communicate without them, why would it not be possible now? The most remarkable fact is that many cases of teenagers, for example, who don’t know the difference between the Spanish verbs "haber" and "a ver", are due to the use of these applications that by the use of and abbreviations, because they forget spelling rules.
I think we could live without the advanced technology we have, but I also think it would be very difficult to step back on this issue. The technology is already a part of the daily rutine of this in our society.
** [this sentence was very confusing and I have tried to re-build the sentence by trying to grasp your main idea. Glad if I got it]
Fecha: 28/02/2013 19:52.
Autor: Jorge Griñán
In my point of view, nowadays it is impossible to live without technology, everything around us has somehow technology, from a bottle to a generation updated cars. Currently, children have been born surrounded by technological devices, and at school the classrooms have at least one computer.
Technology is the biggest culprit of our progress, and where this is seen more clearly, for instance, in cars of 1950’s can’t be compared with today’s cars and all the technologies that they incorporate. Another scope where the technology has an important role is in medicine. Formerly people died because of diseases that today we consider mild, and this is thanks to technology.
In conclusion, I think that the perfect machine doesn’t exist, and it will not never exist ever, but technology make makes our lifes easier and better, and we should trust in her. it
Fecha: 28/02/2013 20:05.
Autor: Mar Asensi Bañón.
A society without technology nowadays? From my point of view society has to get used really fast to technology, because it makes life more confortable and fast.
It’s clear that people have lived without any technology by a large long time, but nowdays things are made to have a technological dynamics.
We have advanced so much in a technological way, and we have considered staple things, gadgets that dind’t which didn’t exist just 20 yeas before, such as computers, smartphones, tablets, ipads and others. we could live without it, but things will turn out so difficult for us because it would will be like remove removing the candy a sweet from the mouth to the of a child, I mean technology have give has given us so many tools to have an eassy life, so that we would’t couldn’t find the way of living without it.
Fecha: 28/02/2013 20:11.
Autor: Mireia Cano Villafaina
Nowadays, technology it’s essencial in our society. From the telecommunications until in personal life, and it continues to envolve. evolving.
We are surrounded by electronics, such as high tech mobiles phones which can take better photos than a camera or recognize your voice.
Besides, a lot of electronics electronical devices have been emerging to the market such as tablets, ipads, e-books and others
The use of technology has many advantages, because suppouse just imagine a lot of advances in medicine or investigation, for example. But it also has drawbacks, as because the social relations have been losing disappearing due to the fact that because people only communicate through by Whatsapp or social networks.
From my point of view, technology it’s required is necessary in our society but moderately.
Fecha: 28/02/2013 22:55.
Autor: Ana Belén López Antón
Really In fact, can anyone think think that the actual today’s society can live without technologies?
Nowadays our live lives are the depend on technology ies; everything that which surrounds us has been created to get facilitate our comfort. If you look carefully around you, that will be easy to see.
Such as t The Internet is a good example for new technology and it is improving with the as years go by. The Internet has got advantages, for example, like it is very faster or like and you can have internet at any time. But it also have has disadvantages, because like you can be too dependent is cause dependence, is a vice or and it could distract students .With the Internet came the mobiles phones came along with it. And with that, began to appear applications such as WhatsApp, Facebook or Tuenti mobil began to appear.
As a conclusion, in my opinion nowadays we can’t live without technologies, they are part of our life and our education. The technologies give them us some comfort confrot.
Fecha: 02/03/2013 17:19.
Autor: Damián Quiles Navarro
It is not posible! I think that it isn´t so because we are accustomed to using technology every day, for news, playing games and so on. Electronic devices have turned out more portable We bring the technology in a more portable, so you can take it her anywhere, so that’s why you can enjoy all your applications where wherever you want like. Even using the technology work Technology can be used even for any job.
[The composition is too short and it is a bit poor]
Fecha: 24/04/2013 12:03.
Autor: Daniel Tomas Valero
On the one hand, it is truth true that people live using technology for all things everything but if people lived without technology in past, why couldn’t people cannot live without technology nowadays? On the other hand, it is also true too is truth that people we use less technologys technologies, because people is they are more committed with the nature and environment.
What`s more, technology technological advances make us live better, why whit because with it, we have less mork work and more leisure. But the technology not only doesn’t bring only good things. The technology too bring but danger and changes in the world.
Hereby, we must control technology its advances and our confidence of this. If we continue improve improving technology technologies, in future, we will have a stilted different world far from nature.
Perhaps it´s better not to think about the answer to that question [Why? You should do it in PAU exam.]
Fecha: 08/05/2013 18:46.
NO MORE COMMENTS ACCEPTED
Write an essay about
HOW IMPORTANT ARE SENSES IN MY LIFE? ABOUT ABOUT OTHER SENSES?
(Personal real experiences)
Autor: Beatriz Bosch Vila
The senses are very important in our life. One at a time, if we had no sense of smell we wouldn’t know by the smell of food if it is in good or bad condition. If we didn’t have (or hadn’t) the sense of touch we wouldn’t notice realise if something is burning our skin or we are falling asleep our feet because of the cold. If we didn’t have (or hadn’t) the sense of hearing we couldn’t call someone to communicate us each other . If we had no sense of taste we couldn’t taste the flavor flavour of good or bad things. And the most important thing, the view sight, if we don’t know that sense we wouldn’t know what life is.
But apart from these senses, I believe that there is a sixth sense that not everyone has developed in the same way. This sense is intuition. For example, often we are often sitting in the classroom and suddenly, we feel as if we are were being observed. If we take a look at the class, possibly one person is looking to where we are sitting.
Fecha: 31/01/2013 21:25.
Autor: Germán Herreiz Blasco
It is true that the five senses are important, but there are some of them are more important than the others, for example in my case, I have no sense of smell because I suffered an accident in my since childhood by an accident, and I’ve led had a normal ordinary life, what I mean is that even if you don’t have lack a sense you can live equally without problems, it is true that it is more complicated if you lack vision or hearing, since because if you are missing the view sight you cannot know that what you have had before, but in this case we can use a WAD (?) in such a way that by means of that sense saying we can do an interpretation of what is before us.
I particularly think the sense that more we often use and at the same time the most important is the ear hearing, since because a certain type of music can remind us of feelings of loneliness, joy and moments that you spent with an important person, and as I’ve said before, from my point of view the ear hearing is the true sense that which unites us with the world and therefore the most important things.
Fecha: 02/02/2013 17:20.
Autor: Ana Belén López Antón
In our daily life, we are aware that our senses such as sight and hearing are indispensable. Although, sometimes we don’t pay too much attention.
Sight and hearing have a key role when you have to perceive elements. If you don’t have it, it can be a problem. Because you can fall or trip tip over something.
I think that everyone should go to the ophthalmologist to inspect check up his/her eyes. As well It is also important to revise your sense of hearing. Because with that you can know all that what is happening around you, almost without almost looking noticing.
Fecha: 03/02/2013 09:27.
Autor: Daniel Fons Sánchez
The senses are important in our life. Without them we couldn’t see, hear, smell, touch or taste. We don’t realize because we use it them every day and at any time, but without them our life would be a real serious chaos.
In my opinion the most important sense is sight. If you don’t think it proves to be twenty-four hours blindfolded and continue with your normal life, I’m not saying that the other senses aren’t important. The hearing is also quite important and it would be very dangerous to go down the street, you couldn’t hear the cars coming. You must take care of all your senses but the view is the most important and it is also the most delicate, so you must pay close attention.
For me the sixth sense doesn’t exist, the senses give us information from the outside, and what many people describe as senses don’t do that.
Fecha: 03/02/2013 10:58.
Autor: Daniel Jarque Pérez
The senses are very important in our life. But above all, the most important is the view sight, because without it we could not see everything around us, we could not see the people that we care so much and with whom we live, we could not play sports like football, basketball etc.
Another reason besides the sport is that we could not watch movies films or videos, or television in general.
The other senses are also important because they can savor the we can taste the food we like, we can with an ear to hear the music that we like, to smell the scents smell surrounding us and we can distinguish by touch the things we touch .
For these reasons and many more, the view sight is the most important sense in my life.
Fecha: 04/02/2013 16:49.
Autor: Mireia Cano Villafaina
The senses are an essential part for the humans, without them, we couldn’t see, hear, feel, taste or smell. ¿How would be the life without one of them?
In my opinion, it’s possible live without some sense, but the life turns more difficult.
Some years ago, I had lived a hart hearted experience.
I was in the street, in front of a zebra crossing, when I saw a man who wore a walking stick, sunglasses and a trained dog.
While the man was crossing the road, the semaphore turned red. Then, people who was in the cars, began to cry and insult him. Probably, these people, didn’t have any blind familiar, and they couldn’t have done an idea about how felt the man.
From my point of view, people who lack some sense, such as sight or hearing, are very limitated for the society, a selfish and lacking-feelings society.
Fecha: 04/02/2013 20:58.
Autor: Diego Cabrera
The senses are very important in daily life. Nowadays, in a society where technology is essential, the lack of some senses can be a big problem. I think that sight is the most necessary sense because if we didn’t have it we wouldn’t be able to use internet, play computer games, watch tv, read books, etc. These are things that we couldn’t live without.
Despite this, I also think the other senses play a very important role in our lives. Once, when I was child, I had a cold, a really bad cold. It meant that I couldn’t taste the flavours of food. Chocolate and rice had the same flavour, it was horrible! For this reason, I think that all the senses are important.
Fecha: 04/02/2013 23:48.
Autor: Andrea Martínez
All senses are equally important to know and interact with our environment and to live our daily lives. Moreover, despite having a greater consideration in sight or taste, without hearing we couldn’t walk properly because we would lose our balance. Or even if we lose our sense of smell, we couldn’t appropriately taste meals.
It’s funny how in school they continue to teach us that there are only 5 senses, when actually there are a few more. For example, we can realize that we can safely move our arms without observing them from outside by sight. Not only when we move, we have a perception of our own body position and without it we probably couldn’t even move without looking what we’re doing. Another example is that we can appreciate the state of rest, fatigue or discomfort in our bodies.
In brief, the senses send a lot more information to our brain that we could even imagine and we aren’t aware that without any of them our lives would be much more complicated.
Fecha: 05/02/2013 20:48.
Autor: alba moreno gimenez
The senses are very important in daily life because they give us information about what is around us. There are five senses and all of them are neccesary for our life.
There are a lot of people who don’t have one sense,such as,there are people who don’t have sight or hearing ... and these people have to live with this problem.
There are people who are born with this problem beacuse the problem can be a genetic problem or other effects of the life( accidents, diseases , the seconds effects of smoke....)
My grandad have a problem of senses, he can’t hear any sound.
Some years ago, in the "mascleta" he exploded on his eardrum and how he is deaf.
It is a problem which you have to learn to cope with.
Fecha: 06/02/2013 19:47.
Autor: Marcos González Moreno
The senses, which permet us knowing what’s happening around us, are an essential part of our life, and, as we know ( from TV or simply from people we know) living without one of them is really hard, but not impossible.
Probably, everyone has meet at least once a blind or deaf person, who has a relatively regular life, with its difficulties, but regular, anyways.
Perosnally, I can’t imagine my life without seeing or hearing anything, or even without one for the other senses.
That’s why I think that people with this kind of disabilities are pretty admirable.
Fecha: 06/02/2013 20:00.
Autor: Natalia Hernández Sanz
Every day, we use the senses for everything that we do. For example, we use the senses when we walk to the street, if a car comes to us too fast, to see the traffic lights. In this example, we use the sense of view. In another moments, for example when we are cooking, maybe we use the sense of touch. When the food is too hot or too cold we touch the food and we ascertain that. Besides, when we speak to another person, we are using the sense auditory.
With this, the senses are too important in this society because if they don’t exist, probably we don’t survive in this world with the news technologies about the TV or the computers. Also, the sense auditory is essential in this world, because the music is important to have fun moments and entertain us. But I think that the most important sense is the view because whit this we can see films, persons, TV, to reading, to driving...
Fecha: 07/02/2013 19:06.
Autor: Efraín Jiménez Molina
A normal person, without any disability, has five senses: sight, hearing, taste, smell and touch. The most valued are the sight and the hearing, and the others are not considered as important as these. But, are there any new or different senses? The diccionary says that a sense is “Any of the faculties by which stimuli from outside or inside the body are received and felt”. If we take this as a starting point, we could think that there are other senses. Maybe some people have a “sixth sense”, a supernatural power, and they can see death people, like in the famous movie. And it’s no need to go that far, some people have the power of knowing the people’s feeling, and they have just to watch them, or they can feel the other’s feelings: that’s called empathy.
Maybe in the future, human beings suffer a evolution that make us able to see and understand the world in a fourth dimension, but hey, they are just simple theories.
Fecha: 08/02/2013 16:28.
Autor: Jonathan Martínez Lillo
For people, the senses are very important for daily living.
Thanks to the senses, we can better understand the world around us and understand it better.
For example, the view allows us to see anything, people, colors ... etc.
Smell helps us distinguish the smells of food, people, flowers and any cosa.Tambien can distinguish between good smells and unpleasant odors, such as garbage.
Touch allows us to touch any object and also know more about him, without touching, we could not perceive textures.
The ear helps us to hear any sound, including music, television and voice of the people.
Taste helps us to savor the taste of food and so we can enjoy it.
In short, without the help of the senses, we could not enjoy life.
Fecha: 08/02/2013 18:52.
Autor: Daniel Tomás Valero
The senses are very important, because without it , we could not understand the world.
The senses are necessary for the day to day, if we had not senses, we couldn´t see the film or smell the food.
For my, the most important sense is hearing, because with this we can listen to music and anything worth.
The other hand smell is also very important, because many studies show that we can remember a smell all live. We associate smell whit good or bad regards, and relate this smell whit experiences of our lifes.
But the senses have also bad things, how eat a bad food or see a scary movie,in this moment many people desire haven´t senses.
Finally , I thing that teh senses are necesary for know the world, for living a lot of experiencies that fill your life whit good times.
Fecha: 11/02/2013 23:42.
Autor: Alejandro Sepúlveda Frontera
In our daily life we use the senses constantly. Without them doing any basic action is very difficult. For example we could not drive or watch TV without hearing. We could not escuhcar music without the sense of hearing. Our life is very difficult without them, they are really necessary.
Could we consider intuition as a sixth sense Scientists say that if we listen to our intuition when making decisions were right 90% of the time because our brain analyzes data collected in previous decisions to decide which is the better choice. So what could be considered as a sixth sense.
I do not think there is any sense as some people claim extrasensory like seeing ghosts or spirits for me all these are fallacies.
Fecha: 12/02/2013 13:37.
Autor: Jorge Griñán
I think that senses are very important for us. But, we believe that we couldn’t live without them, but there a lot of people that can’t see or hear and, with difficulties,they achieve live like us. It must be recognized that the senses make easier our life, for instance, without sight, we couldn’t drive a car, and we would have to walk to everywhere. And without taste, we couldn’t enjoy the wonderful flavors of food. Nowadays, the technology is very advanced, and exist devices for simplify the life of blinds and deafs.
To sum up, I’m not saying that we can live without senses, but I think that is possible have a ordinary life if you can’t see or smell, and I believe that in the future will be easier.
Fecha: 12/02/2013 16:05.
Write a for and against essay about bullfighting. Check book pages 62 and 63
Read all the inventions which are explained in lesson 4, "Fact or Fiction?", then write a text (about 45 words) describing an invention of your own. Don’t use known inventions or those which are on the Internet.
Write your name and class (4º A, B or C)
The Boxer by Simon and Garfunkel
1. Write the Biography of this boxer, according to the word order and rules explained on page 38 of the Student’s Book Viewpoints 1
Subject + Verb + Direct Object + Manner + Indirect Object + Place + Time
2. Use at least three connectors from the following list:
Time sequence
after a while, afterward, as long as, at last, at length, at that time, besides, earlier, eventually, formerly, further, furthermore, meanwhile, moreover, so far, thereafter, until, until now.
Autor: Victoria García
Fecha: 11/12/2012 21:34.
Autor: Mirela Morata
Fecha: 22/12/2012 15:07.
Autor: Lucas Bernácer Soriano
Fecha: 02/01/2013 15:50.
Not have a prayer: No tener la mínima posibilidad - Maybe you refer to this expression.
Autor: Alberto Ponce Valera
Fecha: 02/01/2013 18:29.
(*) didn’t: past is required here
Autor: Daniel López González
Fecha: 05/01/2013 19:03.
Write a brief essay with the Title: "If I were President" (about 75 words); you must use at least 3 connectors from the following
addition: besides, furthermore, moreover
contrast: despite that, nevertheless, otherwise
emphasis: certainly, indeed, in fact
example or illustration: for instance, in other words, in short, thus
summary: all in all, altogether, in summary, on the whole, therefore
* Autor: Daniel Fons Sánchez
Fecha: 10/12/2012 19:08.
NB I build a gym (Yo mismo lo construyo), I have a gym built (lo mando contruir)
* Autor: Sergio Marí Calomarde
Fecha: 11/12/2012 19:24.
Autor: Germán Herreiz Blasco
Fecha: 15/12/2012 11:43.
such as es para enumeraciones
can not es incorrecto; cannot o can’t son las formas correctas
office = cargo político
Autor: Mar Asensi Bañón.
Fecha: 17/12/2012 21:55.
I, always capital letter
reduces is for the 3rd person and never after would
Review Conditional clauses: 1) if + present, will; 2) if + past, would
Autor: Diego Cabrera
Fecha: 27/12/2012 14:49.
Autor: Sofia Palacio Monterde
Fecha: 29/12/2012 16:11.
Autor: Ana Belén López Antón
Fecha: 05/01/2013 10:45.
Autor: Efraín Jiménez Molina
Fecha: 07/01/2013 16:57.
Autor: Guillermo Aucejo Franco
Fecha: 08/01/2013 20:22.